Non-displaced Femoral Neck Stress Fractures in Young Adults: 7-Year Outcomes of Prophylactic Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment.

Retrospectively compare outcomes of prophylactic fixation to nonoperative treatment of incomplete or non-displaced femoral neck stress fractures (FNSF) in young adults. Outcomes of 82 patients (mean age 21.7 years) who were diagnosed with incomplete or non-displaced FNSFs from 2002 to 2015 were compared. Forty-one underwent prophylactic fixation; the remaining were treated without surgery. Fracture characteristics and complications were recorded. Pain scores, modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Scores (HOS) were obtained and compared. The average fracture line in the operative group was 67% of the femoral neck width versus 18% in the nonoperative group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in outcome scores between the two groups. Prophylactic fixation of high-risk non-displaced FNSFs resulted in similar outcome scores to non-operative management of lower-risk variants at an average of 7.3 years follow up. No patient in either group progressed to a displaced femoral neck stress fracture. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(3):173-176, 2020).

Percutaneous Pedicle Screws in the Obese: Should the Skin Incision Be More Lateral?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the skin incision for lumbar percutaneous pedicle screws should be more lateral in the obese patient. METHODS: This was a retrospective radiographic analysis of 30 obese and non-obese lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) radiographs comparing the depth of soft tissue along the anatomic axis of the pedicle at L4 and L5. RESULTS: The average distance from the pedicle trajectory on the skin to the lateral border of the pedicle at L4 was 1.4 cm and 3.8 cm in the non-obese and obese groups, respectively. The average distance from the pedicle trajectory on the skin to the lateral border of the pedicle at L5 was 2.1 cm and 4.3 cm in the non-obese and obese groups, respectively; both these differences reached statistical significance, p <0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This radiographic study supports a more lateral start point for percutaneous pedicle screws in obese patients to maintain an anatomic trajectory when inserting percutaneous pedicle screws into the lumbar spine at L4 and L5. If a skin incision is made at only 1 cm lateral to the pedicle in the obese patient, the surgeon often has to place significant traction on the skin edge to lateralize their instrumentation to achieve an appropriate angle of insertion. By making a more lateral skin incision, less manipulation of the skin and soft tissues is needed to maintain an anatomic trajectory of the pedicle screw. Decreasing soft tissue manipulation may decrease wound and instrumentation complications in this at-risk population.

Preoperative Management of Antithrombotics in Arthroplasty.

Antithrombotic therapy is common in the arthroplasty patient population; the preoperative management of chronic antithrombotic medications requires coordination among the medical team. It is estimated that approximately 250,000 or 10% of patients on chronic antithrombotic medication undergo treatment interruption for surgical procedures annually in North America. Although the description of postoperative anticoagulation management after arthroplasty is extensive, orthopaedic literature describing the preoperative management of antithrombotic therapy is lacking. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing orthopaedic surgeons concise recommendations for the preoperative management of common contemporary antithrombotics in the setting of elective arthroplasty using evidence-based guidelines from other medical specialties. All arthroplasty procedures are considered high bleeding risk in accordance with collaborative AAOS and ACC guidelines. Orthopaedic surgeons should collaborate with their colleagues in cardiology, anesthesia, and other specialties when planning perioperative antithrombotic interruption, particularly in the case of medically complex patients such as those with known risk factors for bleeding and clotting disorders. Resumption of antithrombotic therapy after arthroplasty is beyond the scope of this discussion; this should be performed in accordance with cardiology and anesthesia recommendations.

Unilateral Dislocation of the Posterior Tibialis Tendon (PTT) and Flexor Digitorum Longus Tendon With Contralateral PTT Subluxation in a Patient With Congenitally Shallow Flexor Groove.

INTRODUCTION: Flexor tendon dislocation from the flexor tendon groove posterior of the medial malleolus has been previously described, and may be difficult to diagnose initially, but is amendable to surgical treatment with good outcomes. We present a unique case of unilateral dislocation of the posterior tibialis and flexor digitorum longus tendons with contralateral flexor digitorum longus subluxation that was treated surgically with a good outcome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old active duty male sustained a dislocation and subluxation of the flexor tendons bilaterally after a forced dorsiflexion injury. Bilateral ankle magnetic resonance imaging revealed the injuries that this patient sustained and aided in surgical planning. Surgical Treatment. Bilateral flexor tendon groove deepening with periosteal flap elevation and retinacular repair. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This injury has not been previously described in the literature after a forced dorsiflexion mechanism. Advanced imaging is helpful as this injury may be initially misdiagnosed. This case shows that delayed bilateral reconstruction of the flexor tendon grooves and retinacula are reliable methods for pain relief to allow a patient to return to a physically demanding level of function. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level V.